SYNOPSIS
This page provides a list of misconceptions about heat, and links to simple, authentic resources that will help remediate those misconceptions. The content links to recent Australian research that provides strong evidence for the relative effectiveness of conceptual change oriented instruction as opposed to the standard science instruction.
Studies of hundreds of thousands of students on all continents and across multiple decades continue to show that students have great difficulty distinguishing between heat and temperature. And, text books are not the answer:
The key scientific concept of HEAT is Thermal equilibrium, the notion of the flow of heat energy and an ability to differentiate between heat and temperature.
All text books which deal with HEAT offer different explanations of the term, for example, ‘heat is energy’, ‘heat is a form of energy’, ‘heat comes from sun’, ‘heat is internal energy’, etc. These different explanations arguably simply amplify student confusion.
Another source of difficulty in understanding is the misconceived teaching about Change of state.
The thermodynamic quantities, heat and work, are not changes of state quantities - they are process quantities and they are meaningless in the one important thermodynamic state: the equilibrium state. This is one of the main sources of difficulties with these thermodynamic concepts…
Studies have shown that when students challenge misconceptions by experiment and through discussion, they can quickly acquire the necessary underlying concepts that equip them to develop their understanding of thermal physics. 1)
Thank you for hanging in there so far and, if you watched either video above, you are a legend already :)
Both long-term and recent Australian research have shown the relative effectiveness of conceptual change oriented instruction as opposed to the standard science instruction in heat and temperature related science topics.
Results revealed that conceptual change oriented instruction led to a significantly better acquisition of scientific concepts related to heat and temperature than the standard science instruction.
Thus, the conceptual change oriented instruction described in this study appeared to be successful in changing students many misconceptions related to fundamental ideas about heat and temperature.
It can be said that the main difference between the control and experimental group instruction is the focus on students’ misconceptions. So, if students are drawing on common misconceptions to make sense of new phenomena, the teachers can use this as a tool when designing their instruction. 2)
Many students when asked what heat is, can not go beyond a statement “Heat is a form of energy”.
Some of them relate it to temperature saying that “Heat increases temperature”.
Some talk about heat as the energy content of the system. The students seem to equate heat with internal energy. No student mentions that heat is a form of energy in transit or shows awareness that heat may lead to external work.
In case of temperature, some students seem to equate it to its unit “degrees centigrade”. Some say that it measures the ‘heat content’ of the body. Some use a kind of ‘inverted reasoning’ to make statements such as “temperature causes change in heat” or “temperature is the unit which determines particular states of a body”.
When asked about internal energy, many students seemed to equate internal energy of a system with the total energy of the system.
Thermal equilibrium is a problem area for students. They were asked about the temperature attained by a body kept in a hot enclosure for a sufficiently long time. They seemed to say that the temperature attained depends on the material of the body or on its size. 4)